This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Title Slide
_4747
original title for your presentation, your name, period, date
threshold:
pts
5
to >3.0 pts
Mastery
Student included all the required components of the title slide
blank
3
to >0.0 pts
Proficient
Student is missing one or more components of the title slide requirements
_9573
0
to >0 pts
No Evidence
Does not have a title slide
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Government/Dictator
_4726
Who, when, where. What are key beliefs or goals of this leader/government
threshold:
pts
5
to >3.0 pts
Mastery
Exceptionally thorough and clear, providing comprehensive and relevant information on both the identification and key beliefs/goals.
_8415
3
to >3.0 pts
Above Proficient
Well-detailed and mostly clear in both criteria, with minor omissions.
_8863
3
to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Meets basic expectations with adequate clarity and detail but may lack some depth or specificity.
_3013
2
to >1.0 pts
Approaching Proficient
General information provided. Lacks clarity, detail, or depth in either identification or beliefs/goals.
_61
1
to >0.0 pts
Not Yet
Minimal information provided. Lacks clarity, detail, or depth in either identification or beliefs/goals.
_103
0
to >0 pts
No Evidence
Missing
_1827
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Attempt to Erase History
_4895
Whose history was erased? How did they do this? How successful were they? Why (consider why they targeted that specific group or part of history)?
threshold:
pts
10
to >8.0 pts
Mastery
Exceptionally thorough, detailed, and insightful analysis, with comprehensive and relevant information provided.
_8285
8
to >6.0 pts
Above Proficient
Detailed and mostly thorough with clear and relevant information.
_8175
6
to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Adequate detail and clarity, but may lack depth or comprehensive analysis.
_5879
4
to >2.0 pts
Approaching Proficient
Basic information with some clarity, but lacks depth and specificity.
_6540
2
to >1.0 pts
Not Yet
Minimal, vague, or inaccurate information. Lacks clarity and detail.
_4162
1
to >0 pts
No Evidence
Missing
_6646
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
10 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion
_3421
What does this reveal to you about the importance of studying history? Do you think you have any obligation to learn or remember some history
threshold:
pts
5
to >4.0 pts
Mastery
Exceptionally thorough, detailed, and insightful reflection or statement with comprehensive and relevant reasoning.
_495
4
to >3.0 pts
Above Proficient
Detailed and mostly thorough reflection or statement with clear and relevant insights.
_9209
3
to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Adequate reflection or statement with some insights and reasoning, but may lack depth
_8707
2
to >1.0 pts
Approaching Proficient
Basic reflection or statement with some clarity but lacks depth and specific insights.
_2625
1
to >0.0 pts
Not Yet
Minimal, vague, or unclear reflection or statement. Lacks depth and specificity.
_7166
0
to >0 pts
No Evidence
Missing
_8697
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Bibliography
_7033
make sure to use credible and reliable sources for your research! MLA format
threshold:
pts
5
to >4.0 pts
Mastery
All sources are highly credible and reliable; MLA format is perfectly followed with no errors.
_913
4
to >3.0 pts
Above Proficient
Reliable and credible sources with very few issues; MLA format is correctly followed with minor errors.
_6363
3
to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Mostly credible sources with minor issues; MLA format is mostly followed with some errors
_6394
2
to >1.0 pts
Approaching Proficient
Some credible sources used, but many are not reliable; inconsistent MLA formatting with several errors.
_2363
1
to >0.0 pts
Not Yet
Some credible sources used, but many are not reliable; inconsistent MLA formatting with several errors.
_9238
0
to >0 pts
No Evidence
Missing
_7419
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Design
_6900
Presentation looks professional
threshold:
pts
5
to >4.0 pts
Mastery
Presentation is exceptionally well-organized, polished, and professional, with no noticeable design issues.
_9996
4
to >3.0 pts
Above Proficient
Presentation is well-organized and professional, with only minor details needing improvement.
_6951
3
to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Presentation is adequately organized and generally professional, with some minor design issues.
_1127
2
to >1.0 pts
Approaching Proficient
Presentation has some professional elements but lacks overall cohesiveness and polish.
_7429
1
to >0.0 pts
Not Yet
Presentation looks unorganized and unprofessional with significant issues.
_6298
0
to >0 pts
No Evidence
Missing
_7242
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Attempt to Erase History
_7603
Your group will have 3-5 minutes to present this class with time split relatively evenly between group members. You should not read, but explain the slides and what you learned. Speak as clearly, professionally, and confidently as you can!
threshold:
pts
25
to >20.0 pts
Mastery
Exceptional performance with no noticeable issues. Group members excel in time management, engagement, clarity, and professionalism.
_3208
20
to >15.0 pts
Above Proficient
Good performance with minor issues. Group members meet requirements with clarity, professionalism, and confidence.
_3263
15
to >10.0 pts
Proficient
Adequate performance in time management, engagement, clarity, and professionalism. Group members meet most requirements but lack polish
_6692
10
to >5.0 pts
Approaching Proficient
Some issues with time management, engagement, clarity, or professionalism. Group members partially meet requirements but need improvement.
_4185
5
to >1.0 pts
Not Yet
Significant issues with time management, engagement, clarity, or professionalism. Group members struggle to meet basic requirements.
_2522
1
to >0 pts
No Evidence
Missing
_4906
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
25 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of criterion
threshold:
5 pts
5
to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
0
to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
Total Points:
60
out of 60